Global warming: Latest US-China deal to cut emissions is self-serving

0
183
This figure shows the history of atmospheric carbon dioxide concentrations as directly measured at Mauna Loa, Hawaii. This curve is known as the Keeling curve, and is an essential piece of evidence of the man-made increases in greenhouse gases that are believed to be the cause of global warming. - Graphic: Wikipedia

The Centre for Science and Environment slams it as a business-as-usual deal, which would lead the world to a catastrophic temperature increase of beyond 3 degrees C.

 This figure shows the history of atmospheric carbon dioxide concentrations as directly measured at Mauna Loa, Hawaii. This curve is known as the Keeling curve, and is an essential piece of evidence of the man-made increases in greenhouse gases that are believed to be the cause of global warming. - Graphic: Wikipedia
This figure shows the history of atmospheric carbon dioxide concentrations as directly measured at Mauna Loa, Hawaii. This curve is known as the Keeling curve, and is an essential piece of evidence of the man-made increases in greenhouse gases that are believed to be the cause of global warming. – Graphic: Wikipedia

The Centre for Science and Environment (CSE) has lambasted the “historic” climate deal signed on 12 November 2012 by the US and China as neither “historic” nor ambitious, but just a self-serving agreement between the world’s two biggest polluters.

These two countries (the US is the world’s biggest ‘historical’ polluter while China is the biggest current polluter) announced a joint plan to reduce emissions. Under the deal, the US would reduce emissions by 26-28 per cent below 2005 levels by 2025. The earlier target of the US was 17 per cent by 2020.

China, on its part, would peak its carbon emissions by 2030 and then start reducing it. It has not, however, announced any specific targets. The US has vowed to help China to “slow, peak and then reverse” its emissions.

The deal was announced jointly by US president Barack Obama and Chinese president Xi Jinping in Beijing. According to news reports, the US and China had worked on the deal quietly for the past nine months.

But an analysis by CSE suggests the deal would actually take the world towards a catastrophic beyond 3 degrees C temperature increase pathway.

If this deal goes through…

  • Greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions of the US in 2025 would be 5bn tonnes of carbon dioxide equivalent (CO2e). Its per capita emissions would be 14 tonne CO2e in 2025. In comparison, in 2025, India’s total emissions will be about 4bn tonnes and its per capita emissions would be less than 3 tonnes.
  • From 1990 levels, the US would reduce its emissions by just 15-17 per cent by 2025. In comparison, the European Union will reduce its emissions by at least 35 per cent – more than double that of the US.
  • All estimates show that to meet the 2 degrees C target, US emissions should be at least 50-60 per cent below 1990 levels considering its historical responsibility of causing climate change and its present capability of solving it.
  • China’s emissions would peak at 17-20bn tonnes CO2e by 2030. Its per capita emissions in 2030 would be 12-13 tonnes CO2e. These are not in line with the 2 degrees C emissions pathways as put forth by the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC).
  • Extrapolation of data by CSE indicates that in 2030, per capita emissions of the US and China would converge at 12 tonnes CO2e.
READ MORE:  What does climate action look like?

Commenting on the deal, SunitaNarain, director general, CSE, points out: “It is a self-serving deal in which both countries have agreed to converge their per capita emissions at 12 tonnes in 2030. This is a high level of emission and not in line with meeting the 2 degrees C temperature target mandated by the IPCC.”

The recently released Synthesis Report of the IPCC mentions that the world needs to cut its emissions between 40 and 70 per cent below 2010 levels by 2050 to stay within the 2 degrees C temperature increase pathway. The US-China deal will not allow the world to meet this benchmark, adds Narain.

“This deal puts a sub-standard benchmark for other countries to follow,” says Chandra Bhushan, deputy director general of CSE and the head of its climate change team. “In fact, if India were to follow the principles of this deal, then we need not do anything till 2040 and beyond. Our per capita emissions in 2030 will be less than 4 tonnes CO2e compared to 12 tonnes of the US and China,” he adds.

Bhushan says this deal is a precursor to what we should expect in 2015 in Paris. In the name of getting a consensus in 2015, these two countries are forcing a catastrophic business-as-usual deal on the world.

This deal is also a reality check for the government of India about its stance on global climate negotiations. India will have to decide whether it wants to follow the US-China deal or carve out a different path for itself.

CSE experts believe that India should now work harder with developing countries and push for an ambitious global deal which is equitable and saves the world from catastrophic climate impacts. “India should push for a principal-based emissions reduction target for all countries. This is the only way we can force the US and China to reduce their emissions which are in line with the planetary limits,” adds Narain.

READ MORE:  Schoolchildren converge in Finland for world summit on climate change

The Centre for Science and Environment (CSE) is a public interest research and advocacy organisation based in New Delhi. CSE researches into, lobbies for and communicates the urgency of development that is both sustainable and equitable.

SUPPORT JUSTICE - SIGN ALIRAN'S ONLINE PETITION
Thanks for dropping by! The views expressed in Aliran's media statements and the NGO statements we have endorsed reflect Aliran's official stand. Views and opinions expressed in other pieces published here do not necessarily reflect Aliran's official position.

Our voluntary writers work hard to keep these articles free for all to read. But we do need funds to support our struggle for Justice, Freedom and Solidarity. To maintain our editorial independence, we do not carry any advertisements; nor do we accept funding from dubious sources. If everyone reading this was to make a donation, our fundraising target for the year would be achieved within a week. So please consider making a donation to Persatuan Aliran Kesedaran Negara, CIMB Bank account number 8004240948.
Subscribe
Notify of
guest
0 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments