The speech that wasn’t delivered

3
70

P Ramakrishnan was supposed to deliver this address at an anti-ISA vigil in Penang on 1 August 2010, but before he could speak, four activists were arrested and the police dispersed the crowd.

Rama was unable to deliver his speech to mark the 60th anniversary of the ISA

50 years of ISA – Enough is enough! This is our 53rd year of independence. But for 50 years, that independence has been marred and rendered meaningless by the continued existence of the ISA. It has been used and abused to silence critics and put away dissidents. It is an instrument that threatens our freedom and our civil liberties. It creates a climate of fear.

That is why the indomitable D R Seenivasagam called the ISA “a vicious and repulsive document, a document which is repulsive to all those who believe in democracy.”

He found it “difficult to believe any citizen of this country could have drafted this Bill if he has the interests of his fellow citizens at heart”.

He was right there. The ISA did not serve the interests of the citizens; it only served the interests of those in power.

Under the guise of national security, the ISA has been turned into a political tool to serve the ruling elite to remain in power. Any time and every time the Barisan Nasional was in a fix, it resorted to the ISA to safeguard and entrench its position.

Some 10,000 innocent people have fallen prey to this obnoxious legislation. Without any justification, they have been detained unfairly and unjustly.

Not a single one of them has been charged or convicted in a court of law. They were not brought to court simply because the government had no specific and legitimate charges against them, and their flimsy reasons for detaining them would not have stood up in a court of law.

That is why the court’s jurisdiction to review or challenge their detention has been ousted. The Minister’s decision cannot be challenged in any court of law.

The Minister’s decision is final. End of the matter. That is wrong.

And the Minister has that absolute undemocratic right to extend a detainee’s detention every two years indefinitely. That is wrong.

The detainee can periodically appear before the Advisory Board to state his or her case. Very often it is a waste of time. The Advisory Board that hears a detainee’s representation can only make recommendations to the Home Minister which he usually brushes aside. That is wrong.

Friends: It is a mockery to have a law that does not provide for your defence in a court of law in keeping with natural justice.

It is a mockery to the rule of law when a detained person has no legal access to a lawyer.

It is a mockery to our democratic system when a person can be held in solitary confinement for up to 60 days without family visitation rights whatsoever.

It is a mockery to us as human beings that this terrible law has been allowed to be around for half a century.

Friend, don’t waste your time asking for the repeal of the ISA. It won’t happen. It is the armour that protects the BN. The BN will never throw away this protective shield. The BN will not repeal the ISA. Let’s accept that as a fact.

The only way to remove the ISA is to remove the BN from power. The moment you remove the BN, the ISA will disappear. As long as the BN exists, the ISA will exist.

We should target the BN and channel our energies for the defeat of the BN. When the BN becomes the Opposition in Malaysia, that day will spell the end of the ISA.

Our slogan should be “Remove the BN” – not “Repeal the ISA”.

P Ramakrishnan is president of Aliran

Sign Aliran's 'Save our Democracy" petition
Sign Aliran's petition calling for a review of the decision to grant Riza Aziz a DNAA
Thanks for dropping by! The views expressed in Aliran's media statements and the NGO statements we have endorsed reflect Aliran's official stand. Views and opinions expressed in other pieces published here do not necessarily reflect Aliran's official position.

Our voluntary writers work hard to keep these articles free for all to read. But we do need funds to support our struggle for Justice, Freedom and Solidarity. To maintain our editorial independence, we do not carry any advertisements; nor do we accept funding from dubious sources. If everyone reading this was to make a donation, our fundraising target for the year would be achieved within a week. So please consider making a donation to Persatuan Aliran Kesedaran Negara, CIMB Bank account number 8004240948.
Subscribe
Notify of
guest
3 Comments
Newest
Oldest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
DR.JEFF BALAN
14 Oct 2010 11.46am

… mmmmmmmmm!!!!! MAYBE MAYBE THE GOVENMENT SHOULD USE THE ISA AGAINST … UNDESIRABLE ELEMENT(S) (WHO PROVOKE HATRED) IN RIGHTEOUS MALAY SOCEITY … AND THROW THE KEYS IN THE MALACCA STRAITS.
YOU MAY ASK WHY THE MALACCA STARITS.
YES THIS IS WHERE I, JEFF ANWAR (the son of pengulu shah)HAN , THE SON OF A SHOPKEEPER ALL GREW UP .
YES I WAS CALLED “kling”AND OF COURSE I USED TO CALL ANWAR “kutupat”
ANWAR AND I USED TO CALL HAN (CHINAMAN)
YES SIR THYAT WAS THE GOOD OLD TIMES WHEN WE USED TO HAVE FUN AND GO SWIMMING AT TANJONG KLING
NOW IT SEEMS THAT POLITICAINS WANT TO USE RACE RELIGION AND CREED TO GET ELECTED SO THAT THEY CAN FILL THEIR POCKETS WITH STOLEN MONEY.
YES LOCK THEM UP AND USE THE “isa”

Isma
14 Oct 2010 10.47am

I agree. Being realistic about it, the only way to remove an obnoxious law that is against the very society it is supposed to serve but actually serves only those in power to stay in power is to remove the organization that is behind it. We can expect resistance to their removal and the illegal use of all instruments available to them so the full might of civil society must be harnessed to succeed. Pray there are not more fools than patriots.

AgreeToDisagree
14 Oct 2010 5.59am

PSM’s Employment Bill 2010 is good for democracy. Just imagine too much power to the Minister or how they (could) use pro-BN ladies to cause harm by accusing of non-BN friendly businesses for sexual harrassment.

Hats off to PSM’s action there, even though they are unapproachable and dismissive of ordinary citizens at times, which makes them more of an NGO than a political party.