Is the BN preparing for GE14? – Aliran Monthly 33: 7 editor’s note

In our cover story, P Ramakrishnan says the BN government appears to be preparing the ground for GE14 by introducing repressive new laws to tighten the screws on any potential challenge to its rule.


The controversial amendments to the Prevention of Crime Act and to the Penal Code should be seen in this light.

Meanwhile Kasthuri Patto decries the introduction of these repressive laws, which for many appear to be a reincarnation of the repealed ISA – an ISA version 2.0, if you like – as she recalls the suffering of the ISA detainees during Operation Lalang in 1987.

Charles Santiago follows with a stirring defence of the universally recognised right to a fair trial and the presumption of innocence until proven guilty in an independent court of law.

In our back cover story, Tommy Thomas argues that the Allah decision is wrong in constitutional law, as he says the decisions were poorly reasoned, the law misread and the conclusions baffling.

Greg Lopez wonders if Malaysia is moving away from the conscociational model, where elites of the various communties make decision behind closed doors. Malaysians, he writes, should realise that this model has broken down and all future challenges and solutions should come from the people working with one another.

Finally, Rakyat Jelata looks back at the “comedy of errors” during the recent Chogm summit in Sri Lanka.

Thanks for dropping by! The views expressed in Aliran's media statements and the NGO statements we have endorsed reflect Aliran's official stand. Views and opinions expressed in other pieces published here do not necessarily reflect Aliran's official position.

Our voluntary writers work hard to keep these articles free for all to read. But we do need funds to support our struggle for Justice, Freedom and Solidarity. To maintain our editorial independence, we do not carry any advertisements; nor do we accept funding from dubious sources. If everyone reading this was to make a donation, our fundraising target for the year would be achieved within a week. So please consider making a donation to Persatuan Aliran Kesedaran Negara, CIMB Bank account number 8004240948.
Notify of
1 Comment
Oldest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
Joe Fernandez
26 Dec 2013 4.23pm

The issue, in my considered opinion, is not Allah but: (1) whether the Home Minister has any right in law and the Constitution to tell anyone what he or she should or should not call his or her God, (2) whether such a move can be linked with national security, (3) whether national security can be interpreted in an arbitrary manner, (4) what is “confusion” in law and (5) whether the Home Minister, if he so claims which he didn’t, can claim that he was acting within the prerogative and discretionary powers of Government and in a matter of High Policy. So, tell me, why is there a need to talk about Allah or the issue of Allah in Court or even whether the Sikhs, Arab Christians are using the term etc etc? The Court of Appeal was being disingenuous when it said that the Home Minister followed proper procedures in issuing the directives to the Herald and then went on to make a lot of improper comments on Christianity, Allah etc That’s not the issue to be addressed. I don’t know whether the Herald fell… Read more »