Assault on the Judiciary

0
142 views

The watch for an independent, principled and progressive judiciary, worthy of the people, continues, writes Prema Devaraj.

1988 will long be remembered by Malaysians as one of the blackest periods in our short history as an independent nation born with a commitment to parliamentary democracy and constitutional rule.

For in that year, the Barisan-dominated Parliament passed an amendment to the Malaysian Constituition (Article 121) which was nothing less than a shameless assault upon the integrity and authority of the Judiciary.

The “doctrine of separation of powers” that is the Judiciary as a separate and independent branch of State from the Executive and Legislature was rendered meaningless…. the amendment has destroyed one of the basic fundamental features of the Malaysia Constitution….

And thus began the decline of the judiciary. The country witnessed the suspension of then Lord President Tun Salleh Abas, and as events unfolded, the suspension of five Supreme Court Judges and then the unceremonious sacking of the Lord President and two (of the five) Supreme Court judges.

The downhill slide continued when, following Reformasi in the late 1990s, allegations of manufactured evidence and instructions from above surfaced in court cases. Public confidence in the judiciary hit an all time low.

We witnessed the conviction of Zainur Zakaria, the former president of the Malaysia Bar, in 1998 for contempt for having made the mistake of filing an application in court on the instructions of a client in a cause celebre, and the ruling by the Court of Appeal that no person, body or institution could dicuss the conduct of a judge, good or bad, except parliament.

READ MORE:  Stand by Justice Hamid Sultan Abu Backer!

Some 300 lawyers marched to the Federal Court with chants of “We want Justice!”, donning white ribbons for justice on their black jackets but still the judicial downhill slide continued.

Ten years later, a video clip and the infamous words “Correct, correct, correct” once again prompted cries of protest over the state of the Judiciary and the ongoing shenanigans of alleged corruption and malpractice by judges. The Malaysian Bar called for a royal commission into the state of the judiciary.

In 2007, over 2000 lawyers marched in Putrajaya calling for the sacking of the chief justice … Banners with messagecover33(5)s such as “Stop the patronage, Stop the rot” were carried.

The then president of Aliran said in his statement ‘Redeem the judiciary: Appoint Royal Commission of Inquiry’: “If we love justice, honour the rule of law; if fairness and truth means anything to us; then we must pay heed to the saying ‘There is always time to make right what is wrong’.”

But many court judgments on key issues continue to raise concern e.g. the Altantuya case, police shootings, deaths in police custody, the Teoh Beng Hock case, the Allah decision, and the question of guardianship of minors in conversion cases.

The watch for an independent, principled and progressive judiciary, worthy of the people, continues.

 

Thanks for dropping by! The views expressed in Aliran's media statements and the NGO statements we have endorsed reflect Aliran's official stand. Views and opinions expressed in other pieces published here do not necessarily reflect Aliran's official position.

Our voluntary writers work hard to keep these articles free for all to read. But we do need funds to support our struggle for Justice, Freedom and Solidarity. To maintain our editorial independence, we do not carry any advertisements; nor do we accept funding from dubious sources. If everyone reading this was to make a donation, our fundraising target for the year would be achieved within a week. So please consider making a donation to Persatuan Aliran Kesedaran Negara, CIMB Bank account number 8004240948.
Subscribe
Notify of
guest
0 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments