Pathetic and powerless parliament

6

The worsening crisis of parliamentary democracy has reduced the Prime Minister’s much vaunted promise of real change to sheer hype, writes Martin Jalleh.

Pandikar Amin - Photo credit: galeriusbo at flickr.com

As the political tsunami of 2008 and Najib’s chant of change entered their second year, the public expected Parliament to be truly a place of intellectual discussion, discourse, and debate to determine and decide on the laws and direction of the nation. Sadly, it proved to be a great disappointment.

Instead of displaying a parliament with verve, vigour and vibrancy, there were MPs who got into verbal brawls, others took pride in telling vulgar jokes, some remained virtually silent or vanished from most of the parliamentary sittings and a few were very versatile in histrionics and in veering towards a fist-fight!

There were of course those MPs who vaulted out of the PKR for reasons most vile and venal to be “independent” of the will of the very people who voted for the party they once represented! Their only contribution in parliament was to spew venom against the PKR and to spill its supposed secrets, ironically spoiling their own reputation.

Vacuous answers were given by Ministers, their deputies or representatives to vital questions posed especially by members of the Opposition. To preserve the BN’s veneer of consensus, BN MPs voted according to what the PM and Umno wanted – they were reminded that they have no volition of their own when in parliament!

At times the vituperative speaker and his deputies ignored and even allowed virulent attacks by the BN MPs on PR MPs. Umno MPs had a field day flagrantly violating the rules of parliament. A huge percentage of motions from the opposition were rejected whilst bills were blindly rushed through by the BN’s unabashed brute majority.

READ MORE:  Why is Muhyiddin avoiding Parliament?

Biased Speaker

The sad and scandalous state of affairs in Parliament came to a climax on 16 December 2010. Anwar Ibrahim and three other senior leaders of PR were suspended from Parliament for six months through two separate resolutions in a process fraught with misinterpretation, misrepresentation and deceit.

Well-known writer Kim Quek called it “the butchering of democracy” in Parliament and “undoubtedly the most shameful episode in our parliamentary history”. Soon after the fiasco and fracas, almost all fingers were pointed at the man who plays a very decisive role in Parliament – Speaker Pandikar Amin.

Free Malaysia Today (21 December 2010) put Pandikar in his place: “At every turn, Pandikar Amin was there to thwart the every move of the opposition to seek a just hearing. He was prompt to throw out those sitting on the other side without reason or rhyme. He acted as if he is lord and master of all he surveys and Parliament is just a plaything.

“When coming down hard on the opposition, he gave the impression that opposition lawmakers are an unruly bunch of hotheads who do not deserve to sit in the chamber. They should be ejected. He portrayed the other side as gentlemen of high honour and decorum.

“Pandikar Amin may be the big boss in the Dewan Raykat but he cut a sorry figure in the court of public opinion…Every step he makes is strictly in accordance with the wishes of the ruling political masters….(He) may be a champion and a hero to the BN crowd, but to the people, he is a fraidy-cat who dares not beat an independent path”.

READ MORE:  50,000 signatures! Support soars for online petition calling for two-week Parliament sitting

To Tunku Abdul Aziz (a very well-respected public figure and a vice-president of the DAP), “Mr Speaker is a total disgrace and has turned the Parliament of Malaysia into an object of fun and ridicule. He has completely lost the respect of all fair-minded people, and for sheer incompetence and arrogance he typifies the proverbial square peg in a round hole.”

He added rather aptly: “To the politically biased, it is all too tempting to blame members of the opposition for reacting robustly to the Speaker’s diabolically provocative and heavy-handed ‘interventions’ bordering on intimidation. But that is to ignore the fact that the House is as good as the Speaker. After all, he sets the tone of the House and the standards of parliamentary behaviour.”

The outrageous suspensions of the four PR leaders can only be seen as the pinnacle of Umno’s arrogance. The party has not changed at all. They still make use of the nation’s key democratic institutions like Parliament in their dirty and desperate political game to cling on to power and to contain, cripple and crush legitimate dissent and/or to hinder genuine change advocated by the Opposition.

The worsening crisis of parliamentary democracy in Bolehland reduced the PM’s much vaunted promise of real and radical change and his visage of a transformed country to sheer hype and hypocrisy – especially considering the fact that he was hardly in Parliament in 2010 due to his frequent overseas ventures.

Perhaps for Najib, Parliament is a real nuisance, a non-entity in his great plans to change the nation. If parliament was so indispensable to the PM he would not have unveiled his supposedly radical and revolutionary New Economic Model (NEM) outside the august House – when Parliament was in session!

READ MORE:  Resisting the return of authoritarianism in Malaysia

Soon after the circus on 16 December, a disappointed and disgusted Lim Kit Siang declared that it is now “left to the Malaysian people to use their vote in the next general elections, which is not far away, to administer the full lesson by sending an unmistakable message that the country needs wide-ranging reforms and institutional changes, including Parliament, if Malaysia is to fulfill her promise to take her rightful place in the international arena as a united, competitive, progressive and prosperous nation in the international arena.”

FMT shared Kit Siang’s view: “The only way to restore dignity, honour and justice to the tarnished House and make the Speaker’s chair an object of respect is through the ballot box. Parliamentary democracy can only thrive when the Speaker works for and not against the people’s representatives.”

Martin Jalleh, a well-known political commentator, is a regular Aliran Monthly contributor

Thanks for dropping by! The views expressed in Aliran's media statements and the NGO statements we have endorsed reflect Aliran's official stand. Views and opinions expressed in other pieces published here do not necessarily reflect Aliran's official position.

Our voluntary writers work hard to keep these articles free for all to read. But we do need funds to support our struggle for Justice, Freedom and Solidarity. To maintain our editorial independence, we do not carry any advertisements; nor do we accept funding from dubious sources. If everyone reading this was to make a donation, our fundraising target for the year would be achieved within a week. So please consider making a donation to Persatuan Aliran Kesedaran Negara, CIMB Bank account number 8004240948.
Subscribe
Notify of
guest
6 Comments
Newest
Oldest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
AgreeToDisagree
20 Mar 2011 6.10am

(1) Martin Jalleh may be a good candidate as you seem to believe but frankly nobody really knows, except maybe himself. Yup. Isma is a propaganda spinner. And horrifying if in Jalleh’s employ. He’s better than some of us who’d just want to make sure a choice besides all the creeps appearing on the list is there. It’s a 15,000 expense but in the context of the way this nation is going, an absolute godsend. An experienced liar who intends to entitle his family to 750K of taxpayer monies and allows goons to steal gas tanks from petty traders trying to earn a living, is worse than an inexperienced newbie who could at least can set up a single charity during his tenure or strike down that same 750K entitlement. (2) And why do you seem bent on getting Martin to offer himself when he has maintained a graceful silence to your ideas? There can no longer be a graceful silence in political conditions as these for citizens who care – Jalleh has made his noise by calling parliament ‘Pathetic and Powerless’ but this will not… Read more »

AgreeToDisagree
18 Mar 2011 11.05am

Strong words from someone who has not yet committed to run as an independent candidate in his own constituency. How about it Martin Jalleh? Run for candidacy and then table for rubberstamping, something nice for a change, like making election deposits 15.00 instead of 15,000.

MPs have the power, but their intentions and actions are pathetic. Run for election and give the Rakyat a choice!

Isma
18 Mar 2011 6.34pm

Strong words are better than silence. This country is being run by lunatics, what else can anyone do? Try to run for politics and you will be tripped up at every corner. All kinds of devils will suddenly appear and your vision will be lost. Just try it and see!
We hope the coming GE will enable the rakyat of Malaysia to right the many, many wrongs of over half a century but, if it doesn’t happen, then theres people power and writers like Martin Jalleh to (create awareness) that ultimately will cause the people to rise up….our country’s very existence as a vibrant nation is at stake. Will you stand up as a righteous rakyat to help our country?

AgreeToDisagree
19 Mar 2011 9.53am
Reply to  Isma

Strong words are better but not enough. Concrete action by running as candidate is needed if change is to occur. Just bput your name as a choice and that will be enough. As for tripped up, or losing vision, Jalleh has a better infrastructure and social network than some of us and should have no problem. We hope? Don’t hope, act, by running for candidacy. Our country’s very existence as a vibrant nation is indeed at stake. So why do you say strong words are better than silence when I say running for candidacy is better than strong words? COunterintuitive or just spin? Will Jalleh stand up as a righteous rakyat to help our country? I was asking him the same, and would do so myself. To say strong words are better than silence is LOWERING the bar to an ineffective level accepting substandard action. Or do you merely represent the propaganda arm of BN or PR where you convert potential candidates into arm chair bloggers who just stoke emotions but never act in a concrete manner? What are your intentions spinning like this Isma when… Read more »

AgreeToDisagree
19 Mar 2011 10.00am

Strong words are better than silence but not enough. Only running for candidacy is.

Isma
19 Mar 2011 8.23pm

I look at it this way, running for candidacy in this country when the EC is far from neutral, and for that matter almost all the institutions of power that are supposed to underpin our democracy have been seriously compromised is pretty much like taking an unjustified risky and dangerous gamble. Boldly stepping out with one’s network (not sure if they are really as good as you say) where any manner of unknown devils lurk is like crossing a big minefield. Martin Jalleh may be a good candidate as you seem to believe but frankly nobody really knows, except maybe himself. And why do you seem bent on getting Martin to offer himself when he has maintained a graceful silence to your ideas? Politics is like a game where a mix of natural talent, trained presentation skills, experience, networks, fund raising ability and personal financial strength all have to come together – in short a lot of resources are needed to win. I would prefer someone from a responsible and transparent source to run for candidate and the one currently available that is credible as far… Read more »