Seamless, orderly transfer of power to Wan Azizah

If elections were refused when an Perak’s Zambry was leading a coalition with a margin of 31-28, what more when an incoming menteri besar, Dr Wan Azizah, will be leading a coalition with a margin of 43-13, says Tommy Thomas.

wan azizah

The unanimous decision of the Pakatan Rakyat coalition to support Datu Seri Dr Wan Azizah Wan Ismail as the next Menteri Besar of Selangor means that she will be able to secure 43 votes in a confidence motion in the 56-member Selangor State Legislative Assembly.

One cannot imagine a clearer case of a candidate commanding the confidence of the majority of the Assembly. Yet, there is much disinformation clouding the matter.

Perhaps the best way to provide clarity is to consider previous Barisan Nasional (BN) precedents, particularly at the federal level.

The Federal Constitution and the 13 State Constitutions follow the Westminister system of parliamentary democracy with regard to the appointment of the Prime Minister and the Menteri Besar, whether after a general election or between elections.

The relevant provisions are Articles 40(2) and 43 of the Federal Constitution which are mirrored in Articles 12, 16 and 18 in the Perak Constitution and Articles 51, 53 and 55 of the Selangor Constitution. They are substantially similar.

The first opportunity for the Yang di-Pertuan Agong to exercise discretion to appoint a prime minister of Malaysia outside elections occurred in 1976 with the death of the second prime minister, Tun Abdul Razak.

The political reality in 1976 was that although the federal government comprised members of all the BN coalition component parties, the dominant political party was Umno. Its deputy president, Tun Hussein Onn was the deputy prime minister.

The transfer of power to Hussein Onn was orderly and seamless. There was no question of the constitutional monarch asking the BN coalition to put forward another candidate to Hussein Onn; nor was there any need for a general election.

Similar orderly transfers of power occurred in 1981 when Tun Dr Mahathir Mohamad became prime minister, in 2003 when Tun Abdullah Badawi became prime minister, and in 2009 when Datuk Seri Najib Razak became prime minister.

In each case, the incumbent resigned from office.  Yet in none of the three episodes did the Agong ask for two candidates, and general elections were never an option.

So by established political reality and constitutional convention, when Pakatan puts forward Dr Wan Azizah as their leader in Selangor with the support of 43 members in a 56-member House, a transfer of power should occur, as has happened in this country on countless occasions.

It should be equally orderly and seamless. It is certainly not a crisis situation. Nor is there an emergency. It is just an illustration of a political coalition wishing to change its leader in mid-stream: a common enough occurrence in democracy which Umno has done many times.

It must never be forgotten that in Selangor, Pakatan secured over 1 million votes representing more than 60 per cent of the total votes cast, well over the 52 per cent popular vote that it had received nationally. For these voters, so long as Pakatan remains the governing coalition, the personality of the menteri besar is very much a secondary issue. Dr Wan Azizah would certainly be supported by the vast majority of this electorate.

Finally, even at the state level, the recent episode in Perak is instructive.  The 31-28 Pakatan majority in 2008 became a 31-28 BN majority in 2009 when three assembly members switched allegiance. Datuk Seri Nizar Jamaluddin, as the menteri besar who lost support of the majority, sought dissolution of the Assembly, which was refused by the Sultan of Perak. The BN’s nominee, Datuk Seri Zambry Abdul Kadir, was sworn in as the new menteri besar.

The BN coalition governed the state comfortably for the remaining four years.

If elections were refused when an incoming menteri besar (Zambry) was leading a coalition with a margin of 31-28, what more when an incoming menteri besar (Dr Wan Azizah) will be leading a coalition with a margin of 43-13. Only stability will ensue. Accordingly, Dr Wan Azizah should be sworn in as menteri besar as soon as possible.

Source: The Malaysian Insider

(Visited 230 times, 1 visits this week)

Comments

comments

You may also like...

Receive a FREE daily email of our latest website posts
Subscribe

2 Responses

  1. charleskiwi says:

    Who’s aspiration is causing all these chaos and, at one time also the in fighting that saw the three parties that formed PKR plus chance of another state election ? And why is it now every one of these three parties is trying to avoid a fresh state election ? Should that happens will PKR be reelected and also will all the present PKR state assembly men be reelected and if elected with the same amount of majority ?
    That must be the first thought in the minds of the incumbent assembly men.
    Sure enough those who are really dedicated will but the big question is will PKR survive if a reelection is called ? ..

  2. Ed G says:

    The MB is chosen by the elected candidates and not the other way round. Therefore, it is total nonsense if an MB were to be allowed to ask for the ones who appointed him to be reelected instead. A man with a sense of honor would have stepped down willingly without much fuss if it has become obvious that he has fallen out of favor with his appointers irrespective of whether he agrees with their reasons.

    But the above logic seems to elude the incumbent MB Khalid. Instead, he shamelessly tried to hang on to his position. He even had the audacity to claim the possession of ‘majority support’ when he only had, at the very best, 50% of the support. And that was before the PAS deserted him thus leaving him with a meager support of less than 25%. Having realized that his position has already been rendered untenable, he took on a damage control mode by assuming the role of a wronged victim who has to ‘defend his integrity’. But it is baffling that he sees that stubbornly staying on as MB is the way to defend his integrity instead of answering to the accusations that touch on the question of his integrity, his attitude or efficacy as a leader; sort of being akin to a spoilt brat who refused to budge from his position while throwing his tantrums at everyone who gets in his way. Now we are waiting with bated breathe on whether he next bout of tantrum is going to lead to the deprivation to others what he cannot hold on to.

Come on, tell us what you think

Over 4000 people receive our FREE weekly e-newsletters with the latest insights
Subscribe now