No immunity for rape

 

There is an urgent need to reject sexual violence, irrespective of whether such violence is committed in Malaysia or abroad, says Prema Devaraj.

Source: Malaysiakini

Source: Malaysiakini

The Malaysian government’s decision to allow the extradition of its diplomatic attache Muhammad Rizalman Ismail, who was charged on 10 May in a Wellington District Court in New Zealand with burglary and assault with intent to commit rape on a 21-year-old woman, is welcomed.

It was of great concern to many that instead of being made to stand trial, Rizalman was flown back to Malaysia on 22 May under the protection of diplomatic immunity, despite the seriousness of the alleged crime.

The actions by our government, i.e., requesting the sealing of all documentation pertaining to the case and the withdrawal of all charges against Muhammad Rizalman as well as the decision not to waive diplomatic immunity, did not bode well for the government’s standing not only in the eyes of its citizens but also in the international arena.

The use of diplomatic immunity at that point effectively enabled the accused to evade a criminal justice process where he would have been made to account for his alleged actions.

By allowing this, the Malaysian government was in breach of General Recommendation 28 of the Convention for the Elimination of All Forms of Discrimination Against Women (Cedaw), to which Malaysia is a signatory. Cedaw states that our government has a duty, among other things, to bring perpetrators of violence against women to trial and to impose punishment.

The Defence Minister and the Foreign Minister had assured Malaysians that justice would prevail and that Rizalman would face a board of inquiry set up by the defence ministry, and if accusations were found to be true, he would be court-martialed.

But many Malaysians were left wondering how a board of inquiry could be used to investigate a serious criminal offence, i.e., attempted rape. It raised a fundamental question of the government’s approach towards investigating sexual crime.

Furthermore it was unclear how an investigation into the alleged crime could properly take place given that the victim and investigating officers were in New Zealand.

More than a month after Rizalman’s return, the status of the investigation in Malaysia was as yet unknown.

The government must act to fulfil both local and international commitments towards ending violence against women. There is an urgent need to stand resolute in rejecting sexual violence, irrespective of whether such violence occurs on Malaysian soil or is committed by a Malaysian abroad.

As such, the decision taken to send Rizalman back to New Zealand to stand trial is the appropriate step to take.

Prema Devaraj is a programme consultant at the Women’s Centre for Change in Penang.

Source: The Malaysian Insider.

(Visited 168 times, 170 visits this week)

You may also like...

Receive a FREE daily email of our latest website posts
Subscribe

1 Response

  1. charleskiwi says:

    Until this (alleged) sex maniac is extradited stop diverting the issue, he may be a small peanut as far as Umno is concerned but the Umno schmucks are coming out with all the excuses to impede this (alleged) sex maniac from being extradited. For now he remains in Malaysia for his mental problems which no doubt will be used as the reasons in his defense why he did what he did.
    That is, if he ever gets to be indicted, after all if that should ever happen the Umno schmucks must have considered that he is dispensable because he is just a small fry besides the publicity this case is getting international attention. It wouldn’t have happened if he was someone higher up.
    What the hell is happening to this administration, it was the the “C4″ of the mongolian woman, then it was the disappearing of MH370 now this (allegedly) sex hungry diplomat, haven’t Malaysia got enough international attention ? What is next ?
    Why was the murder of the mongolian (appeared to be) ‘covered’ up for so long and nothing seem to have happened to the culprit…?
    Most of all why was Najib not suing the person who is accusing him of (being implicated in) this crime when he deems it fit to sue Malaysiakin for whatever ‘crime’ they have done !

Come on, tell us what you think

Over 5000 people receive our FREE weekly e-newsletters with the latest insights
Subscribe now