Why we don’t need S114A of Evidence Act

 Posted by on 15 August 2012  Add comments
Aug 152012
 
Share via email

Martin Jalleh compiles quotes from lawyer Edmund Bon to show why we don’t need the hotly disputed Section 114A of the Evidence Act that shifts the burden of proof to the accused.

Print Friendly
Share via email
(Visited 301 times, 3 this week)

  One Response to “Why we don’t need S114A of Evidence Act”

  1. Fatwar
    15 August 2012 at 5.31pmReply
     

    What we really don’t need is the BN gomen!

    If we’ve been assed as near Failed State not much is left. Or is there?

Leave a Reply