Why we don’t need S114A of Evidence Act Posted by Aliran on 15 August 2012 Add comments Aug 152012 Facebook0Twitter0Martin Jalleh compiles quotes from lawyer Edmund Bon to show why we don’t need the hotly disputed Section 114A of the Evidence Act that shifts the burden of proof to the accused. (Visited 21 times, 1 visits this week)FacebookTwitterEmailPrint Comment guidelines Please refrain from personal attacks, unnecessary racist slurs, inflammatory or hate speech, crude language and libellous comments. Comments are entirely the commenters' responsibility and are subject to moderation. One Response to “Why we don’t need S114A of Evidence Act” Fatwar 15 August 2012 at 5.31pmReply What we really don’t need is the BN gomen! If we’ve been assed as near Failed State not much is left. Or is there? Leave a Reply Cancel reply Connect with Facebook Name (required) E-mail (required, but will not be displayed) URI Your Comment You may use these HTML tags and attributes: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong> Yes, add me to your mailing list. Notify me of follow-up comments by email.