The amendments to the Election Offences Act are designed solely for the purpose of making the voting process less transparent, asserts Ambiga Sreenevasen.
On 19 April 2012, many Bills were rushed through Parliament. One of them, which appears to have escaped the attention of the public, was a Bill that sought to amend the Election Offences Act 1954.
The amendments are, to say the least, shocking and have far reaching consequences upon the voting process.
They are designed solely for the purpose of making the voting process less transparent. Needless to say this Bill was passed.
1. Those that publish defamatory, racist and sexist remarks may do so with impunity
Section 11(c) which had required any print materials to have the names and addresses of its printer and publisher is DELETED IN FULL.
This means that anyone can now put up anonymous defamatory, racist or sexist posters without identifying the publisher or printer. Poison posters will now become standard fare. This goes completely against Bersih 2.0’s demand to end dirty politics.
2. Election monitoring at EC’s discretion
s14 1(A) is replaced with a clause which allows the Election Commission to appoint time slots to determine when polling agents or counting agents of a candidate may be present. Therefore the time when an agent of a candidate is allowed into the Polling Station is no longer fixed and is now left to the discretion of the EC to decide. They are free to remove Agents from Polling Station at will.
The reality is that polling and counting agents are usually appointed by the candidate and this ensures a more transparent process. However, with the new amendment there are possibilities of abuse. The time schedule is best understood by the candidates as they organise their agents according to their time availability, as most of them are volunteers. If the time schedule is at the discretion of the EC, this may mean that different persons are being rotated and this does not allow the agents to observe inconsistencies systematically. Worse, when such a time schedule is applied during vote counting, as it again may open up opportunities for mis-counting.
3. Curbing candidates and their staff from checking on identity of voters
S26 1(e) which allowed for checking of the identity of any person entering a polling centre is DELETED IN FULL.
The implication is that candidates and its election staff are not allowed to check on the identity of voters to establish if they are genuine or even to help them to identify if they are at the correct polling station. This also means that phantom voters or multiple voters will not be detected. The 50m exclusion zone outside the polling centre is now extended to 100m or more, depending on what the EC to decide. This makes it impossible for election monitors to see anything illegal going on.
It will also make it impossible to see if a voter is marked with indelible ink thus minimising its effect.
4. Election agent or candidate disallowed at election booths (barong)
s26A Sub-section (2) and (3) are DELETED IN FULL. This means that all channels of election observation are sealed off as it now does not allow election candidates and staff to observe the registration of voters during polling day. Such an amendment opens up possibilities of abuse and fraud. There will be no more Barung Observers who were previously the only non-EC people able to look at the IC of the voter and pick up discrepancies. This is a major blow to the plans to weed out phantom voters. They can now walk in freely and the polling agent (even if he is allowed into the polling station) will have no opportunity to look at the IC of the voter. The same point about indelible ink made above, will apply
These amendments which have been introduced so late and bulldozed through Parliament makes a mockery of our electoral process. More importantly it makes a mockery of the Parliamentary Select Committee (PSC) as it appears that these amendments were hidden from them. What does the PSC have to say about this?
Today, Bersih 2.0 reiterates its call for the Election Commissioners to resign immediately as it has failed to uphold the rakyat’s demand for a clean, fair and democratic electoral system. In fact it is unashamedly doing the opposite.
If anyone had any doubt that Bersih 3.0 is necessary, that doubt is now dispelled with this latest move. These amendments confirm our worst fears that the 13th GE will be the dirtiest yet.
The audacity with which these amendments are proposed and the speed with which they were passed reflects the utter contempt being shown for the rakyat’s call for clean and fair elections.
The EC must resign for allowing such amendments to be proposed.
We urge members of the public to read the amendments for themselves and then to fax the EC at 603-88889117 to express their views and if seen fit to call for their resignation.
Salam Bersih 2.0!
DUDUK BANTAH!
Dato’ Ambiga Sreenevasan is Co-chairperson of the Steering Committee for the Coalition for Clean and Fair Elections (Bersih 2.0)
If such unfair laws designed to keep the Gov in power are allowed, what’s there to hope for by the rakyat?
Isn’t it time to call in the UN for help to monitor the PR13?
I most humbly and sincerely want to highlight and bring to all Malaysians’ attention the predicament faced by my 59 years old sister. She is Chithiralega A/P A Sinniah. Born in Telok Anson and now living in Klang with her 64 years old husband.She is in possession a genuine IC, a genuine citizenship card as well as a genuine birth certificate. My sister had voted in all the GE except the last one. She was told her name was not in the electoral list. She then took it lightly as an error had occurred.
But then when she went to check and confirm her GE registration this time around,, her name was still missing. When she called the Election Commission she had a shock of her life. She was told that she was dead and was questioned whether she had lived in Kedah.
She was further advised to check with JPN. when my sister and her husband went to the JPN, the officers there confirmed that her
IC is invalid because the record showed that she was dead. They were unable to give a logical and proper explanation and interogate her as if she was in possession of an illegal IC.Eventually they told her that the case would be investigated and she will be informed. When requested to be given a letter so that she could register for the GE or apply for a passport, she was given the cold shoulder and denied. When thousands of people in this country are struggling to get their IC, people with genuine IC are declared dead. That too helpless and poor old people. Is this the way to treat the ‘Warga Mas’? I suspect something fishy is going on. Perhaps this is one way to create panthom voters. Who is coming forward to help out my poor sister who has done no wrong but denied her citizen rights? Who declared her dead? Who made this gross mistake? Is it deliberate or a administrative blunder? I challenge the authority concerned to rectify this so called ‘technical’ or ‘computer’ error as soon as possible and enable my sister to vote in the coming GE or else face further media exposure and legal action for sure. Kindly do the necessary. Thank you.